Oracle函數(shù)使索引列失效的解決辦法
在索引列上使用函數(shù)使得索引失效的是常見(jiàn)的索引失效原因之一,因此盡可能的避免在索引列上使用函數(shù)。盡管可以使用基于函數(shù)的索引來(lái)解決索引失效的問(wèn)題,但如此一來(lái)帶來(lái)的比如磁盤(pán)空間的占用以及列上過(guò)多的索引導(dǎo)致DML性能的下降。本文描述的是一個(gè)索引列上使用函數(shù)使其失效的案例。
一、數(shù)據(jù)版本與原始語(yǔ)句及相關(guān)信息
1.版本信息
SQL> select * from v$version; BANNER ---------------------------------------------------------------- Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.3.0 - Production CORE 10.2.0.3.0 Production TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.3.0 - Production NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
?2.原始語(yǔ)句與其執(zhí)行計(jì)劃
SQL> set autotrace traceonly exp; SELECT acc_num, curr_cd, DECODE('20110728', (SELECT TO_CHAR(LAST_DAY(TO_DATE('20110728', 'YYYYMMDD')), 'YYYYMMDD') FROM DUAL), 0, adj_credit_int_lv1_amt + adj_credit_int_lv2_amt - adj_debit_int_lv1_amt - adj_debit_int_lv2_amt) AS interest FROM acc_pos_int_tbl ACC_POS_INT_TBL1 WHERE SUBSTR(business_date, 1, 6) = SUBSTR('20110728', 1, 6) AND business_date <= '20110728'; Execution Plan ---------------------------------------------------------- Plan hash value: 3114115399 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 336K| 12M| 96399 (1)| 00:19:17 | | 1 | FAST DUAL | | 1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | |* 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| ACC_POS_INT_TBL | 336K| 12M| 96399 (1)| 00:19:17 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 2 - filter(SUBSTR("BUSINESS_DATE",1,6)='201107' AND "BUSINESS_DATE"<='20110728')
從執(zhí)行計(jì)劃可以看出,SQL語(yǔ)句使用了全表掃描,而where 子句中只有唯一的一列business_date
3.表上的索引信息
SQL> set autotrace off; SQL> set linesize 190 SQL> @Idx_Info Enter value for owner: goex_admin old 10: AND owner = upper('&owner') new 10: AND owner = upper('goex_admin') Enter value for table_name: ACC_POS_INT_TBL old 11: AND a.table_name = upper('&table_name') new 11: AND a.table_name = upper('ACC_POS_INT_TBL') TABLE_NAME INDEX_NAME COL_NAM CL_POS STATUS IDX_TYP DSCD ------------------ ------------------------ -------------------- ------ -------- --------------- ---- ACC_POS_INT_TBL ACC_POS_INT_10DIG_IDX SYS_NC00032$ 1 VALID FUNCTION-BASED ASC NORMAL ACC_POS_INT_TBL ACC_POS_INT_10DIG_IDX BUSINESS_DATE 2 VALID FUNCTION-BASED ASC NORMAL ACC_POS_INT_TBL ACC_POS_INT_10DIG_IDX CURR_CD 3 VALID FUNCTION-BASED ASC NORMAL ACC_POS_INT_TBL PK_ACC_POS_INT_TBL ACC_NUM 1 VALID NORMAL ASC ACC_POS_INT_TBL PK_ACC_POS_INT_TBL BUSINESS_DATE 2 VALID NORMAL ASC
從索引的情況上來(lái)看有一個(gè)基于主鍵的索引包含了BUSINESS_DATE列,而查詢(xún)語(yǔ)句并沒(méi)有走索引而是選擇的全表掃描,而且預(yù)估所返回的行Rows與bytes也是大的驚人,cost的值96399,接近10W。
二、分析與改造SQL語(yǔ)句
1.原始的SQL語(yǔ)句分析
SQL語(yǔ)句中where子句的business_date列實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)記錄過(guò)濾
business_date <= '20110728'條件不會(huì)限制索引的使用
SUBSTR(business_date, 1, 6) = SUBSTR('20110728', 1, 6)使用了SUBSTR函數(shù),限制了優(yōu)化器選擇索引
基于business_date列來(lái)建立索引函數(shù),從已存在的索引來(lái)看,必要性不大
2.改造SQL語(yǔ)句
SUBSTR(business_date, 1, 6) = SUBSTR('20110728', 1, 6)的實(shí)質(zhì)是等于當(dāng)月,即限制返回的行為從2011.7.1日至2011.7.28
因此其返回的記錄大于等于2011.7.1,且小于2011.7.28
做如下改造
business_date >=to_char(last_day(add_months(to_date('20110728','yyyymmdd'),-1)) + 1,'yyyymmdd')
3.改造后的SQL語(yǔ)句
SELECT acc_num, curr_cd, DECODE('20110728', (SELECT TO_CHAR(LAST_DAY(TO_DATE('20110728', 'YYYYMMDD')), 'YYYYMMDD') FROM DUAL), 0, adj_credit_int_lv1_amt + adj_credit_int_lv2_amt - adj_debit_int_lv1_amt - adj_debit_int_lv2_amt) AS interest FROM acc_pos_int_tbl ACC_POS_INT_TBL1 WHERE business_date >= to_char(last_day(add_months(to_date('20110728', 'yyyymmdd'), -1)) + 1, 'yyyymmdd') AND business_date <= '20110728';
4.改造后的執(zhí)行計(jì)劃
Execution Plan ---------------------------------------------------------- Plan hash value: 66267922 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1065K| 39M| 75043 (1)| 00:15:01 | | 1 | FAST DUAL | | 1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACC_POS_INT_TBL | 1065K| 39M| 75043 (1)| 00:15:01 | |* 3 | INDEX SKIP SCAN | PK_ACC_POS_INT_TBL | 33730 | | 41180 (1)| 00:08:15 | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 3 - access("BUSINESS_DATE">='20110701' AND "BUSINESS_DATE"<='20110728') filter("BUSINESS_DATE">='20110701' AND "BUSINESS_DATE"<='20110728')
改造后可以看到SQL語(yǔ)句的執(zhí)行計(jì)劃已經(jīng)由原來(lái)的全表掃描改為執(zhí)行INDEX SKIP SCAN,但其cost也并沒(méi)有降低多少
三、進(jìn)一步分析
1.表的相關(guān)信息
SQL> @Tab_Stat Enter value for input_table_name: ACC_POS_INT_TBL old 11: WHERE table_name = upper('&input_table_name') new 11: WHERE table_name = upper('ACC_POS_INT_TBL') Enter value for input_owner: goex_admin old 12: AND owner = upper('&input_owner') new 12: AND owner = upper('goex_admin') NUM_ROWS BLKS EM_BLKS AVG_SPACE CHAIN_CNT AVG_ROW_LEN AVG_ROWS_PER_BLOCK LST_ANLY STA ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ------------------ --------- --- 33659947 437206 1322 855 0 99 77 27-SEP-11 NO
2.索引的相關(guān)信息
SQL> @Idx_Stat Enter value for input_table_name: ACC_POS_INT_TBL old 11: WHERE table_name = upper('&input_table_name') new 11: WHERE table_name = upper('ACC_POS_INT_TBL') Enter value for input_owner: goex_admin old 12: AND owner = upper('&input_owner') new 12: AND owner = upper('goex_admin') BLEV IDX_NAME LF_BLKS DST_KEYS NUM_ROWS LF_PER_KEY DAT_BLK_PER_KEY CLUS_FCT LST_ANLY ---- ------------------------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------------- ---------- --------- 3 PK_ACC_POS_INT_TBL 155658 33777720 33777720 1 1 33777447 27-SEP-11 3 ACC_POS_INT_10DIG_IDX 160247 32850596 32850596 1 1 32763921 27-SEP-11
3.嘗試在BUSINESS_DATE列上創(chuàng)建索引
SQL> create index I_ACC_POS_INT_TBL_BS_DT on ACC_POS_INT_TBL(BUSINESS_DATE) tablespace tbs_tmp nologging; Index created. SQL> @Idx_Stat Enter value for input_table_name: ACC_POS_INT_TBL old 11: WHERE table_name = upper('&input_table_name') new 11: WHERE table_name = upper('ACC_POS_INT_TBL') Enter value for input_owner: goex_admin old 12: AND owner = upper('&input_owner') new 12: AND owner = upper('goex_admin') BLEV IDX_NAME LF_BLKS DST_KEYS NUM_ROWS LF_PER_KEY DAT_BLK_PER_KEY CLUS_FCT LST_ANLY ---- ------------------------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------------- ---------- --------- 2 I_ACC_POS_INT_TBL_BS_DT 93761 908 33659855 103 506 460007 30-SEP-11 3 PK_ACC_POS_INT_TBL 155658 33777720 33777720 1 1 33777447 27-SEP-11 3 ACC_POS_INT_10DIG_IDX 160247 32850596 32850596 1 1 32763921 27-SEP-11
建立索引后聚簇因子較小,差不多接近表上塊的數(shù)量
4.使用新創(chuàng)建索引后的執(zhí)行計(jì)劃
Execution Plan ---------------------------------------------------------- Plan hash value: 2183566226 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1065K| 39M| 17586 (1)| 00:03:32 | | 1 | FAST DUAL | | 1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACC_POS_INT_TBL | 1065K| 39M| 17586 (1)| 00:03:32 | |* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I_ACC_POS_INT_TBL_BS_DT | 1065K| | 2984 (1)| 00:00:36 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 3 - access("BUSINESS_DATE">='20110701' AND "BUSINESS_DATE"<='20110728')
從上面的執(zhí)行計(jì)劃看出,SQL語(yǔ)句已經(jīng)選擇了新建的索引盡管返回的rows,bytes沒(méi)有明顯的變化,但cost已經(jīng)少了近7倍。
以上所述是小編給大家介紹的Oracle函數(shù)使索引列失效的解決辦法,希望對(duì)大家有所幫助。在此也非常感謝大家對(duì)本站網(wǎng)站的支持!
版權(quán)聲明:本站文章來(lái)源標(biāo)注為YINGSOO的內(nèi)容版權(quán)均為本站所有,歡迎引用、轉(zhuǎn)載,請(qǐng)保持原文完整并注明來(lái)源及原文鏈接。禁止復(fù)制或仿造本網(wǎng)站,禁止在非www.sddonglingsh.com所屬的服務(wù)器上建立鏡像,否則將依法追究法律責(zé)任。本站部分內(nèi)容來(lái)源于網(wǎng)友推薦、互聯(lián)網(wǎng)收集整理而來(lái),僅供學(xué)習(xí)參考,不代表本站立場(chǎng),如有內(nèi)容涉嫌侵權(quán),請(qǐng)聯(lián)系alex-e#qq.com處理。